Title: Crack Growth and Residual Strength Analyses of Cracks
Under and Beyond a Main Cargo Surround Doubler at a Lap Joint
Objective:
To illustrate the process of estimating crack growth behavior to
set inspection limits.
General
Description:
This problem focuses on a damage
tolerance assessment of skin lap joints underneath a main cargo door surround doubler for
the purpose of determining multiple crack link up and establishing inspection intervals
for a long crack growing from underneath the doubler. The critical area includes the main cargo door
surround doubler and the existing fuselage skin. The
stresses acting at the doubler attachments to the lap splices are derived from a
conservative loading spectrum based on pressure loading. The
critical area was modeled using Franc2DL for the long crack case to propagate the crack to
obtain K vs. a values and NASGRO3.0 to compute the life of the
cracked structure for both cases.
Topics Covered:
Damage tolerance assessment, stress intensity solutions using finite element
analysis, crack growth analysis, residual strength calculation, inspection intervals
Type of Structure:
fuselage skin
Relevant
Sections of Handbook: Section
2, 4, 5, 11
Author:
Lesley Camblin
Company Name: Structural
Integrity Engineering
9525 Vassar
Chatsworth, CA 91311
818-718-2195
www.sieinc.com
Contact Point:
Matthew Creager
Phone:
818-718-2195
e-Mail:
mcreager@sieinc.com
Overview of Problem Description
This problem focuses on the
fuselage skin lap joints in transport aircraft when a main cargo door surround doubler is
present. The doubler covers parts of
the lap splices adjacent to the main cargo door cutout.
The lap splices that are covered are 4L, 10L, 14L, and 19L. The doublers consist of patches of rectangular
sheets butt spliced together. This problem
addresses the potential for skin crack initiation at multiple locations and crack growth
underneath the doubler.
Figure SIE-5.1. Main Cargo Door Doubler Installation
Figure SIE-5.2. Multiple Crack Linking Case.
Figure SIE-5.3. Long Crack Case.
Structural Model
Franc2DL models two-dimensional geometries with multiple layers
fastened together. Therefore, the geometry of
the Franc2DL finite element model involves the creation of multiple layers, each with
equivalent areas as that of the structure being modeled. These layers and geometry are
created in a meshing program, 'Casca', which are then incorporated via a conversion
program, 'Casca to Franc', into Franc2DL.
The basic model is as shown in Figure
SIE-5.4. The layers include the 0.04 inch
skin, 0.07 inch surround doubler, 0.05 inch tear strap, 0.07 inch doubler splice back up
plate, and 0.07 inch skin circumferential splice. The
fastener pitch in a row is 1.0 inch. The skin residual strength stress was used in the
models.
Figure SIE-5.4. Close Up
View of Aft Doubler Edge
Figure SIE-5.5. Basic
Franc2DL Model.
The material properties for each element within a layer are defined
individually to account for changes in material type and thickness. Layers are fastened
together with rivets, which are treated as finite element springs for which the user must
define the stiffness.
If the skin cracks at the upper row of fasteners in a lap joint
link underneath the doubler, a long crack completely covered by the doubler could be
formed. Since the crack is covered, it is
necessary to determine if the doubler can help maintain the residual strength of the skin
lap splices. This is done by using a cracked
element in Franc2DL as shown below.
Figure SIE-5.6. Franc2DL
Cracked Element.
The most critical location for a long crack is a crack growing from
the edge of the door cutout towards the adjacent doubler edge (FS650-FS700). At lap splices 10L and 14L, a crack is located
within one row of fasteners from the doubler edge.
Figure SIE-5.7. Long Crack Model.
Note that Franc2DL is used to propagate the crack(s) to obtain
K vs. a values. This
is input as tabulated data into NASGRO3.0 to compute crack growth life.
Model Geometry Description
It is conceivable that cracks could have been present at most
fastener holes in the top row of the lap splice at the time of the surround doubler
installation. Since there were no inspections
for cracks at the existing fastener holes prior to installation, it is necessary to
establish the maximum crack size that could have been present. The largest multiple cracks that could have been
present would have had crack lengths not quite long enough to cause failure under the
standard operating loads. An ultimate
strength failure criterion will be used for the ligament between two cracks emanating from
adjacent holes and approaching each other (the applied K for the resulting crack size will
be much smaller than the Kc for 2024-T3 thin sheet). For an applied cyclic stress of 16.8 ksi and a
nominal ultimate strength of 66 ksi for 2024-T3, this will create a crack configuration as
shown in Figure SIE-5.8 (Li = (1-16.8/66)/2 = 0.373
in.).
Figure SIE-5.8. Initial MSD
Crack Length.
The cyclic stress for fatigue crack propagation after the 0.07 inch
doubler installation on the 0.04 inch skin is (0.04/0.11)*16.8 = 6.11 ksi. For a 3/16 inch diameter hole, the initial crack
length for crack growth is ai = 0.373-3/32 = 0.279 inches. Note that this method of establishing the possible
crack size of any cracks present is conservative since it assumes that the largest
possible crack is present at all holes simultaneously.
The stress intensity factors for the
case of cracks at adjacent holes, as shown in Figure SIE-5.9,
were derived by combining several existing standard solutions.
Figure SIE-5.9. Multi-Site
Damage Crack Growth.
Figure SIE-5.10. Equally
Spaced Cracks, Tada Case 7.1.
Figure SIE-5.11. Single Crack Solution, Tada case 5.1.
Figure SIE-5.12. Two Equal
Cracks from a Hole, Tada case 19.1.
Combining the solutions
and solving for K1 gives:
After obtaining K1, the crack growth analysis can be
performed using the NASGRO3.0 data table option for a one-dimensional data table for
through cracks, DT01, with a unit stress. The
crack lengths and corresponding b values are shown
below.
Table SIE-5.1. NASGRO Input Values for MSD
DT01.
a (in.) |
K2 |
K3 |
K4 |
K1 |
b |
0.05 |
0.6964 |
0.6720 |
0.7068 |
0.7325 |
1.8481 |
0.1 |
0.8348 |
0.7802 |
0.7941 |
0.8498 |
1.5161 |
0.2 |
1.1494 |
0.9606 |
0.9563 |
1.1442 |
1.4434 |
0.25 |
1.3678 |
1.0392 |
1.0325 |
1.3589 |
1.5334 |
0.275 |
1.5120 |
1.0763 |
1.0690 |
1.5018 |
1.6157 |
0.28 |
1.5452 |
1.0836 |
1.0762 |
1.5347 |
1.6363 |
0.285 |
1.5802 |
1.0908 |
1.0834 |
1.5694 |
1.6586 |
0.29 |
1.6172 |
1.0980 |
1.0905 |
1.6062 |
1.6827 |
0.295 |
1.6564 |
1.1051 |
1.0976 |
1.6451 |
1.7089 |
0.3 |
1.6982 |
1.1122 |
1.1046 |
1.6866 |
1.7373 |
0.305 |
1.7427 |
1.1192 |
1.1116 |
1.7308 |
1.7682 |
0.31 |
1.7904 |
1.1262 |
1.1186 |
1.7783 |
1.8019 |
0.315 |
1.8418 |
1.1332 |
1.1255 |
1.8293 |
1.8389 |
0.32 |
1.8973 |
1.1401 |
1.1324 |
1.8845 |
1.8795 |
0.325 |
1.9576 |
1.1470 |
1.1392 |
1.9444 |
1.9243 |
0.33 |
2.0235 |
1.1538 |
1.1461 |
2.0099 |
1.9740 |
0.335 |
2.0959 |
1.1606 |
1.1528 |
2.0819 |
2.0293 |
0.34 |
2.1760 |
1.1673 |
1.1596 |
2.1616 |
2.0915 |
0.345 |
2.2655 |
1.1740 |
1.1663 |
2.2505 |
2.1617 |
0.35 |
2.3664 |
1.1807 |
1.1730 |
2.3508 |
2.2419 |
0.355 |
2.4814 |
1.1873 |
1.1796 |
2.4652 |
2.3343 |
0.36 |
2.6142 |
1.1939 |
1.1862 |
2.5972 |
2.4422 |
0.37 |
2.9569 |
1.2070 |
1.1993 |
2.9379 |
2.7250 |
0.38 |
3.4783 |
1.2200 |
1.2123 |
3.4564 |
3.1634 |
0.4 |
7.1360 |
1.2455 |
1.2379 |
7.0925 |
6.3270 |
The stress intensity factors, K, and corresponding crack lengths
for the long crack case are taken from the Franc2DL model.
This model was run with the skin residual strength stress of 18.426 ksi. The K values are converted into betas for a unit
stress using the equation:
The b and crack length
values are input into NASGRO3.0 using the same data table option as for the MSD case. Table SIE-5.2 shows the
crack lengths, K values, and calculated b values
for the long crack case.
Table SIE-5.2. NASGRO Input Values for Long Crack DT01.
a (in.) |
K |
b |
48.066 |
35.49 |
0.1567 |
53.066 |
44.58 |
0.1874 |
58.066 |
58.57 |
0.2353 |
63.066 |
71.35 |
0.2751 |
68.066 |
81.82 |
0.3037 |
73.066 |
88.29 |
0.3163 |
78.066 |
93.84 |
0.3252 |
83.066 |
105.2 |
0.3534 |
Inspection Capabilities and Crack Limits
The long crack will be detectable once it grows out from underneath
the surround doubler. The crack will be
directly accessible externally and inspected for by using either HFEC or detailed visual
techniques. With a HFEC inspection, the
minimum detectable crack size in the field is assumed to be a 0.125 inch crack away from a
fastener hole. With a detailed visual
inspection, the minimum detectable crack size in the field is assumed to be a 3.0 inch
uncovered crack.
Structural Loading and Stress History Description
The stress spectrum is considered to have a remote stress due to
cabin pressurization. Cabin pressurization
primarily causes hoop tension in the fuselage. The
GAG pressurization load is based on FAR25.571. The pressure condition is comprised of a
8.6 psi normal operating differential pressure and an additional 0.5 psi external
aerodynamic pressure. A factor of 1.1 is only
applied to the normal operating pressure for residual strength.
The limit stress used for residual strength purposes in this
scenario is calculated as stated earlier according to FAR25.571.
Material Property Description
In Franc2DL, materials can be assigned to each element
individually. Material properties that are
user defined for the models in this analysis are as follows; Young's modulus, Poisson's
Ratio, and thickness. The values used for the
long crack case are shown in Table SIE-5.3.
Table SIE-5.3.
Material Properties and Growth Rate Data.
Material |
Youngs
Modulus |
Poissons Ratio |
2024-T3 Aluminum |
10.3E+06 |
0.35 |
The outer skin and doubler are made from 2024-T3 IAW QQ-A-250/5. The material properties from the NASGRO3.0
libraries are used for the crack growth rate properties.
The material properties used are for 2024-T3; Clad, Plate and Sheet; T-L; LA &
HHA NASGRO3.0 material code M2EA12AB1.
Table SIE-5.4. Material
Properties and Growth Rate Data.
MATL
1: 2024-T3
Clad Plt & Sht; L-T; LA & HHA
Material
Properties:
:Matl: UTS : YS : K1e
: K1c :
Ak : Bk : Thk : Kc :
Keac :
:
No.: : : : : :
: : : :
:----:------:------:------:------:-----:-----:-------:------:------:
: 1 : 66.0: 53.0: 46.0: 33.0: 1.00: 1.00:
0.036: 66.0: :
:Matl:---------------
Crack Growth Eqn Constants -------------------:
:
No.: C :
n :
p : q :
DKo : Cth+ :Cth- : Rcl:Alpha:Smax/:
: :
: : :
: : : :
: :SIGo :
:----:---------:-----:----:----:------:------:-----:----:-----:-----:
: 1 :0.829D-08:3.284:0.50:1.00: 2.90: 1.50:
0.10:0.70: 1.50: 0.30:
The Kc value is conservative for the long crack case. This value was changed to 108.9 ksivin.
(Department of Defense Damage Tolerant Design Handbook) in order to better calculate the
actual crack growth in a large panel.
Solution Technique
The multiple cracks case is conveniently solved using NASGRO3.0
with the crack growth interactions previously discussed, while the long crack case is
solved using Franc2DL and NASGRO3.0. The
spectrum is the same for both cases and is included as a constant amplitude GAG cycle with
100 flights per block, with a single block applied per schedule.
Results
Critical crack
size/Residual Strength
The residual strength stress for the multiple cracks is
(0.04/0.11)*18.4 = 6.7 ksi. This stress
results in a critical crack geometry as shown in Figure SIE-5.13
(Lf = (1-6.7/66)/2 = 0.449 in.). The
final crack length is af = 0.449-3/32 = 0.355 inches.
Figure SIE-5.13. MSD
Critical Crack Length.
Life:
Based on the calculations for growing the crack in NASGRO3.0 and
the MSD crack growth interactions, the life from initial crack size to failure is
determined to be 16,868 flights. The results
of crack length and crack depth versus life are shown in Figure
SIE-5.14. The life is given in numbers
of flights. These results show that there is
ample time before multiple cracks present at the time of the surround doubler installation
link up and become critical.
Figure SIE-5.14. Crack Growth Life for MSD Case.
Based on the calculations for growing the crack in NASGRO3.0 for
the long crack case, the life from initial crack size to failure is determined to be
65,554 flights. The results of crack length
and crack depth versus life are shown in Figure SIE-5.15.
Figure SIE-5.15. Crack Growth Life for Long Crack Case.
Inspection Intervals
The threshold and repeat intervals for the long crack case are
calculated using the life reduction factors shown below.
Life Reduction
Factors:
K1 = 2.0
K2 = 2.0, Multiple load path structure
Detectable crack
length (HFEC at edge of doubler):
Number of flights @ detectable crack length, Ndet =
17,400 flights
Detectable crack
length (Detailed visual at edge of doubler):
Number of flights @ detectable crack length, Ndet =
35,200 flights
Critical crack
length: c = 83.3659 in.
Number of flights @ critical crack length, Ncrit =
65,554 flights
References
Tada, H., P. Paris, and G.
Irwin, "The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook," Third Edition.