Section 1.3.4.4. In-Service Inspection Damage Assumptions
The basic rationale used to write assumed sizes following an
in-service inspection is essentially the same as for the case of intact
structure. Once it is established that
reliance on in-service inspection is required to ensure safety, the damage size
assumed to exist after an in-service inspection is that associated with the
appropriate level of NDI capability, as opposed to that associated with initial
manufacturing inspection capability. In
special cases where specific part removal at the depot is economically
warranted, the contractor may recommend that this action be taken. In this case, the assumed damage subsequent
to part removal and inspection may be smaller than that associated with
in-service inspection capabilities. It
may in fact be the same as in the original design, providing the same
inspection procedures as used in production are used and certified inspection
personnel perform the inspection.
Figure 1.3.6 and Table 1.3.3 summarize the in-service post inspection
damage sizes as a function of conditions and thickness, from JSSG-2006 Table
XXXII. With fasteners installed and
sufficient accessibility to the location, the maximum undetectable damage size
is 0.25 inch of uncovered length at fastener holes. Depending upon part thickness, this damage may be a through or
part-through flaw. The flaw size was
established based on limited available inspection reliability data where the inspection
was performed on the assembled aircraft as opposed to the part level inspection
performed during production fabrication.
These assumptions are considered to be applicable for penetrant,
magnetic particle, and ultrasonics.
Because of lack of sensitivity, X-ray is not considered appropriate for
detecting tight fatigue cracks and thus is not applicable to these flaw size
assumptions.
Figure 1.3.6. Summary of Initial-Flaw Sizes for Structure Qualified as
In-Service-Inspectable
Table
1.3.3. In-Service Inspection
Initial Flaw Assumptions
Accessibility
|
Inspection Method
|
Initial Flaw Assumption
|
Off-aircraft or on-aircraft with fastener removal
|
Same as initial
|
Same as initial
|
On-aircraft without fastener removal
|
Penetrant, magnetic
particle, ultrasonic, eddy current
|
For t £
0.25”, 0.25” through thickness flaw at holes;
For t £ 0.25”, 0.50” through
thickness flaw at other locations;
For t > 0.25”, 0.25” radial
corner flaw at holes;
For t > 0.25”, 0.25” deep x
0.50” long surface flaw at other locations
|
On-aircraft with restricted accessibility
|
Visual
|
For slow crack growth,
non-inspectable
For fail-safe structure, primary load path failed
|
At locations other than holes or cutouts, a flaw size of
surface length 0.50 inch is assumed to be representative of depot level
capability. Where visual inspection is
performed on the assembled aircraft, the minimum assumed damage is an open
through the thickness crack having an uncovered length of 2 inches. This value was established based on visual
inspection reliability data derived from inspection of large transport type
aircraft during fatigue testing and subsequent teardown inspection, shown in Figure 1.3.7.
Figure 1.3.7. Development of Minimum NDI Detection for Visual Inspection