Title: Residual Life Assessment of Corroded Fuselage Lap Joints
Objective:
To illustrate the process for including the effects of corrosion in
the residual life assessment of fuselage lap joints.
General
Description:
This problem focuses on the methods that can be used to carry out a
residual life assessment of corroded fuselage lap joints.
The first method is based on the Equivalent Initial Flaw Size approach, which can
be used for quick assessments of the impact of corrosion on the structural integrity. The second method based on the holistic life
assessment approach can be used to carry out a corrosion damage tolerance analysis on
environmentally sensitive components. Finite
element techniques will be described to take into account the increased stress caused by
the build-up of corrosion products between the different layers of skin, referred to as
corrosion pillowing. This change
in stress is required for both methods. The
AFGROW crack growth rate program is also used in the first method to calculate the number
of cycles to failure.
Topics Covered: life
assessment, equivalent corrosion damage, finite element analysis.
Type of Structure:
fuselage lap joints
Relevant
Sections of Handbook: Section 8
Author:
Nicholas C. Bellinger
Company Name: National
Research Council Canada
Institute for Aerospace Research
Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0R6
1(613) 993-2410
www.nrc.ca/iar
Contact Point:
Jerzy P. Komorowski
Phone: 1 (613) 993-3999
e-mail: jerzy.komorowski@nrc.ca
Overview of Problem Description
This problem focuses on the impact that corrosion has on the
residual strength of transport fuselage lap joints, Figure NRC-2.1,
as well as the techniques that can be used to determine this impact. This example will concentrate on using the
Equivalent Initial Flaw Size (EIFS) approach to predict the fatigue lives of pre-corroded
lap joint specimens that were subjected to constant amplitude loading. To differentiate the use of the EIFS approach in a
corrosion fatigue situation, the phrase Equivalent Corrosion Damage (ECD) is
used. A new procedure, known as the holistic
life assessment approach, currently being developed for implementation by the United
States Air Force, will also be discussed.
The corrosion products contained in aircraft lap joints fabricated
from 2024-T3 clad aluminum were analyzed and found to contain a mix of oxides, primarily
aluminum oxide trihydrate. This type of
oxide had a molecular volume ratio to the alloy from which it originated of 6.45
(Bellinger et al., 1994). It was this high
molecular volume ratio that is responsible for the deformation of the riveted skins in a
joint resulting in the appearance commonly referred to as corrosion pillowing,
Figure NRC-2.2.
Figure
NRC-2.1. Lap joint consisting of
two skins and a stringer. All dimensions are
in inches (1 inch=25.4 mm)
Figure
NRC-2.2. D SightTM
Image Showing Pillowing Caused By Corrosion Product Accumulation
Analytical Predictions Using Experimental ECD Values
Experiments have been carried out at NRC Canada on lap joint
specimens, Figure NRC-2.3, to determine the effect that
corrosion has on the fatigue life. Three
levels of corrosion were studied: 0%, 2% and 5% average material loss. The results from these tests, which will be used
to verify the capability of the ECD concept to predict the effect that corrosion has on
the residual life of corrosion lap joints are present elsewhere (Eastaugh et al., 1998a),
(Eastaugh et al., 1998b), (Eastaugh et al., 2000). The
majority of the crack nucleation sites for the specimens were located away from the rivet
hole along the faying surface. The cracks
were semi-elliptical in shape.
Figure
NRC-2.3. Schematic of Lap Joint
Specimen
Equivalent Corrosion Damage Values
The procedures to determine the equivalent corrosion damage from
corroded (artificial and natural) lap joints are shown in another example problem within
this Damage Tolerance Design Handbook. In
this example, coupons were machined from pristine and artificially and naturally corroded
lap joints and tested to failure. The
corroded lap joints contained different levels of material thinning, 2% and 5% thickness
loss. Using scanning electron microscopy and
back-calculations, ECD values were determined for the different corrosion levels. All the fatigue nucleation sites were
semi-elliptical in shape.
As the cracking scenario that was present in the lap joint
specimens (i.e. elliptical crack located away from the hole edge) is not present in crack
growth rate programs, it was decided to calculate a semi-circular crack length with an
equivalent area to the ECD values. These
calculated crack lengths are plotted against the number of cycles to failure in Figure NRC-2.4.
Figure
NRC-2.4. Equivalent Circular Radius Versus Number of Cycles
to Failure for Pristine, 2% Artificial and Natural and 5% Combined Coupons
Since the version of AFGROW that was used for this example was not
capable of predicting a multi-site damage scenario, it was decided to concentrate on
predicting the number of cycles to the first observed crack as well as the number of
cycles to reach a specified crack length. This
length was chosen to be small enough as to not be influenced by other cracks at the other
rivets.
Finite Element Analysis
The critical rivet holes in fuselage lap joints are subjected to a
complex stress state that is a result of different loading conditions. One load that has a strong influence on the stress
state is the secondary bending, which is caused by the eccentric loading in the lap
joints. Another one is the pre-stress that
results from the rivet installation, which has a significant effect on the crack growth
under the rivet head (Liao et al., TBP). Finally,
for corroded joints, the out-of-plane displacements, or pillowing, have a very strong
influence on the stress state along the faying surface of the lap joint.
Since the AFGROW program could not determine this complex stress
state, stress correction curves had to be generated to take into account the different
test conditions, 0%, 2% and 5% thickness loss as well as entered into the program. To generate such curves, three finite element
models of the lap joint specimens were generated using the commercial finite element
package MSC Patran/Nastran (Bellinger et al., 1994; Bellinger et al., 1997). Each model was generated consisting of two 1.02 mm
(0.04 inch) skins joined together with three 100o countersink rivets as shown
in Figure NRC-2.5.
Figure
NRC-2.5. Finite Element Mesh of
MSD Specimen
All finite element models were generated with first-order brick
elements to model the skins and rivets while nonlinear gap elements were used to model the
skin/rivet interface. Symmetrical boundary
conditions were applied along the edges of the joint and clamped boundary conditions were
applied along one or both short edges, depending on the load case being modeled.
In the first model, the prestress caused by the rivet clamping
force was simulated by applying a pressure to each rivet head. All the nodes were merged in this particular model
to prevent the surfaces from overlapping. In
the second model, a fixed displacement was applied along a skin edge to simulate the hoop
stress while the opposing edge was fixed in all directions.
The skins directly under the rivet heads were assumed to transfer some of the load,
which was simulated by merging the nodes in these areas.
To simplify the third model (corrosion), it was assumed that the
material loss due to corrosion was constant throughout the entire joint (Bellinger et al.,
1994). An initial finite element run was
carried out in which a pressure of 6.89 kPa (1 psi) was applied to the faying surfaces. The volume under the resulting deformed shape, Vfem,
was determined using methods available in the Patran software. The actual volume required, Vreq, to accommodate the corrosion
products given a specific material loss was then calculated using:
|
(1) |
where,
Vmr is the molecular volume ratio, 6.454 for 2024-T3 clad aluminum, and a and b
are the rivet spacing. On the basis of the results from the chemical analysis, the
corrosion products were considered to be incompressible (i.e. Youngs modulus of the
products was significantly higher than that of aluminum).
Therefore, a linear relationship was assumed to be present, and thus the
pressure-to-volume ratios for the 6.89 kPa and the actual models were set equal:
|
(2) |
From
this equation, the pressure necessary to obtain the required volume was determined, which
was then reapplied to the faying surfaces in the corrosion model and the corrosion finite
element analysis was re-run. D Sight images
of fuselage lap joints have shown that only a small amount of pillowing occurs at the free
edges compared to the area between the rivets. D
Sight is an enhanced visual inspection technique that is very sensitive to out-of-plane
displacements (Komorowski et al., 1996). To
accommodate this smaller volume, the pressure was progressively decreased from the rivets
to the free edges in the finite element model (Bellinger et al., 1997).
To
determine the resultant stress that would occur from a combination of the three load
cases, the elemental stress values were combined (added together) within the Patran
program.
To
determine the effect that skin thickness loss has on the stress in a joint, four
conditions were studied: 1) no corrosion, 2) corrosion simulated by decreasing skin
thickness, 3) corrosion simulated by pillowing and 4) corrosion simulated by pillowing
with effective skin thickness reduction. A
10% thickness loss was assumed to be present in all the corrosion models. For the effective thickness loss models, only the
outer skin thickness was reduced. The
resulting maximum principal stress was non-dimensionalized with respect to the remote
stress and plotted in Figure NRC-2.6 for the critical river
row (in terms of potential for cracking). As
shown in this figure, pillowing has a greater influence on the stress as compared to the
effective thickness loss alone and thus needs to be included in a residual life assessment
analysis.
Figure
NRC-2.6. Effect On Stress Caused
by Reduction of Outer Skin Thickness as Compared to Pillowing (10% Thickness Loss)
The resulting stress plots for the outer faying surface at the
critical rivet row area for the 2% thickness loss is shown in Figure
NRC-2.7. As can be seen from this figure,
the maximum stress in these joints did not occur at the location 90 degrees to the loading
direction. To take this change into account,
the stress values were determined along the two lines shown in this figure. These values were then non-dimensionalized with
respect to the remote stress of 98.5 MPa (14.3 ksi) and the resulting stress correction
curves are plotted in Figure NRC-2.8.
Figure
NRC-2.7. Stress plot of maximum principal stress at
critical rivet hole in 2% corroded specimen. The blue lines show the location where the
stress results were taken to obtain the stress correction factors that were used in the
AFGROW program.
Figure
NRC-2.8. Stress Correction Factors Used in AFGROW Program
to Correct for Secondary Bending and Corrosion Pillowing Effects
Residual Life Predictions
A single corner crack located at a straight hole was used to
predict the lap joint test results in addition to a constant amplitude loading with a load
ratio of 0.02 and a maximum stress of 98.5 MPa (14.3 ksi).
Short and long crack growth rate curves were used in the AFGROW program to predict
the test results. For the 2% and 5% cases,
the maximum stress was increased by the appropriate amount to take into account the stress
increase caused by material thinning. The
appropriate stress correction factors shown in Figure NRC-2.8
for the different test cases were used in the AFGROW program to take into account the
secondary bending, rivet pre-load and corrosion pillowing.
The results for the different test cases are presented in Table
NRC-2.1 along with the average ECD value, the final crack length and the percent
difference in the predicted versus observed cycles.
Table NRC-2.1. Predicted versus
experimental cycles to failure
% Corrosion |
ECD
(mm) |
Final Crack (mm) |
Predicted
# of Cycles |
Experimental Results |
% Diff |
Pristine |
0.05303 |
1.422 |
359600 |
332800 |
-8.1 |
10.16 |
395700 |
375356 |
-5.4 |
2% Artificial |
0.05512 |
4.313 |
172300 |
160770 |
-7.2 |
10.16 |
190600 |
171500 |
-11.1 |
5% Combined |
0.06736 |
8.974 |
104400 |
104107 |
-0.3 |
12.70 |
106800 |
115409 |
7.5 |
-ve %
differences indicate the predicted values over-estimated the number of cycles. |
The final crack length shown in Table
NRC-2.1 is the crack length at which the particular analysis was stopped. The smallest number presents the average first
observed crack length. The other number gives
the specified crack length that was chosen to prevent interaction with other cracks in the
lap joint specimens. The experimental results
are an average value of all the tests carried out at the specified average thickness loss. As can be seen from Table
NRC-2.1, the majority of the predicted values give non-conservative results
(over-estimate), which suggests that some of the areas near the critical rivet row had
higher levels of corrosion than was first assumed. It
should also be noted that the experimental results for the 5% case was based on only one
test result. The remainder of the tests had
either failed outside of the critical rivet hole at a large corrosion pit or a number of
rivets had failed resulting in a stress redistribution that was not included in the finite
element results.
Holistic Life Assessment Approach
In the lap joint specimens, corrosion and fatigue acted
sequentially and thus were easier to model. Therefore
it is no surprising that the calculated results were very close to the experimental ones. What was unexpected was that all the assumptions
that were made (constant thickness loss, corner crack, etc.) did not appear to have a
significant effect on the predicted results. It
must be emphasized, however, that this particular sequence (corrosion then fatigue) would
not be expected to occur in aircraft structures. Since
in-service corrosion and its associated metrics, which include material thinning, surface
topography (such as pits and intergranular attack) and pillowing, evolve, this implies
that the ECD value would also change over time. Therefore
this ECD approach could be only used to provide a quick assessment of the impact of
corrosion on the remaining life of a particular component.
Back-calculations could be carried out on failed components, or on samples
fabricated from similarly damaged components and fatigue tested to failure, to estimate
the ECD value. These calculated values could
then be used to calculate the remaining life of the other components to determine if it
could remain in-service until the next inspection interval.
The major disadvantage in the ECD approach is that it cannot take
into account the fact that corrosion and fatigue act simultaneously in lap joints and also
it is very test intensive. Another procedure
known as the holistic life assessment approach, which is capable of predicting the
progress of a discontinuity state in a material from cradle-to-grave (holistic) could be
used to carry out a corrosion damage tolerance assessment of critical
structural components. This approach allows
for an evaluation of a change in state during any time-slice in the holistic model. The terms that have been established to reflect
these states include the Initial Discontinuity States (IDS) as well as the Modified
Discontinuity States (MDS). IDS is a material
characteristic that is related to the intrinsic material discontinuities or the intrinsic
manufacturing and joining discontinuities that are present in pristine structures. However, once age degradation is considered then
the effect time has on the discontinuity state must be taken into effect. Although IDS itself does not change over time,
both cyclic and time domain mechanisms continue to evolve discontinuities.
IDS is used in the analysis to determine the effect that corrosion
and cyclic loading has on a structure from the As-Built to To-Be
condition. The To-Be condition is
the predicted state of the strucutre after a predetermined amount of time. MDS on the other hand is used in the analysis to
determine the effect that corrosion and cyclic loading has from an As-Is to
To-Be condition. For this time
interval, nondestructive inspection techniques would be used to determine the damage state
present in the structure and the results would then be used in the analysis to modify the
stress state.
Once IDS data and verified holistic life models become available,
this approach will be the preferred method of residual life assessment.
References
Bellinger, N.C., Krishnakumar, S. and Komorowski, J.P. (1994),
Modelling of Pillowing Due to Corrosion in Fuselage Lap Joints, CAS Journal,
Vol. 40, No. 3, September 1994, pp. 125-130.
Bellinger, N.C., and Komorowski, J.P. (1997), Corrosion
Pillowing Stresses in Fuselage Lap Joints, AIAA Journal, Vol. 35, No. 2, February
1997, pp. 317-320.
Liao, Min and Xiong, Yeuxi, Prediction
of Fatigue Life Distribution of Fuselage Splices, to be published in the
International Journal of Fatigue.
Eastaugh, G.F., Merati, A.A., Simpson, D.L., Straznicky, and
Krizan, D.V. (1998a), The Effects of Corrosion on the Durability and Damage
Tolerance Characteristics of Longitudinal Fuselage Skin Splices, 1998 USAF Aircraft
Structural Integrity Program Conference, San Antonio, 1-3 December 1998.
Eastaugh, G.F., Merati, A.A., Simpson, D.L., Straznicky, P.V.,
Scott, J.P., Wakeman, R.B. and Krizan, D.V. (1998b), An Experimental Study of
Corrosion/Fatigue Interaction in the Development of Multiple Site Damage in Longitudinal
Fuselage Skin Splices, NATO-RTO Air Vehicle Technology Panel Workshop on Fatigue in
the Presence of Corrosion, Corfu, Greece, 7-8 October 1998.
Eastaugh, G.F., Straznicky, P.V., Krizan, D.V., Merati, A.A. and
Cook, J. (2000), Experimental Study of the Effects of Corrosion on the Fatigue
Durability and Crack Growth Characteristics of Longitudinal Fuselage Skin Splices,
Published in the Fourth Joint DoD/FAA/NASA Conference on Aging Aircraft, St. Louis, MO,
15-18 May 2000.
Komorowski, J.P., Bellinger, N.C., Gould, R.W., Marincak, A. and
Reynolds, R. (1996) Quantification of Corrosion in Aircraft Structures with Double
Pass Reflection, CAS Journal, Vol. 42, No. 2, June 1996, pp. 76-82.