8:00-8:30 |
Welcome and Introductions (Continental Breakfast)
|
8:30-9:30 |
Current AFGROW Release Overview
James Harter, Alexander Litvinov, James Lambert - LexTech, Inc
|
9:30-10:00 |
3D fatigue crack path deflection and residual stresses in 17-4PH stainless steel rod
Trevor Shoemaker - USAF, A-10 ASIP Analysis Group
Damage tolerant structures require accurate fatigue crack growth rate models for life prediction. Central to these
models are fracture mechanics similitude and empirically gathered growth rates. In this work, standard test
methods failed to achieve similitude for 17-4PH stainless steel round-rod but succeeded for plate. Material
product form differences are interrogated through constant dK tests, crack path analysis, residual stress (RS)
characterization, and growth rate simulation. Analyses revealed that quench-induced RS in the round-rod promoted
a non-planar, 3D crack path with closure effects. Strategies to mitigate the RS/path effects are evaluated
by controlling constraint, closure, environment, and heat treatment.
the published paper of this presentation:
Shoemaker, Trevor K., et al. "3D Fatigue Crack Path Deflection and Residual Stresses in 17-4PH Stainless Steel Rod." International Journal of Fatigue (2023).
|
10:30-11:30 |
Fracture Analyses of Thin-Ductile Aerospace Materials
J. C. Newman - Fatigue & Fracture Associates, LLC
The critical crack-tip-opening angle or displacement (CTOA/CTOD) fracture criterion is one of the oldest fracture criteria applied to metallic materials. Improved computer-aided photographic methods have been developed to measure CTOA during the fracture process; and elastic-plastic, finite-element analyses (ZIP2D) with a constant CTOA and a plane-strain core have been used to simulate fracture of laboratory specimens. The fracture criterion has been able to link the fracture of laboratory specimens to structural applications. This paper analyzes fracture of cracked thin-sheet 2219 aluminum alloy over an extremely wide range in width, crack-length-to-width ratio, and applied loading (tension, bending, and combined tension-bending loads). The results from the critical CTOA fracture analyses on the thin-sheet material showed that the stress-intensity factor at failure (KIe) was linearly related to the net-section stress (Sn), as predicted by the Two-Parameter Fracture Criterion (TPFC).
|
11:30-12:00 |
A-10 Aft Cowl Cracking Analysis: An Example of Structural Digital Engineering
Brian Boeke - USAF, A-10 ASIP Analysis Group
The A-10 program office performed an urgent action TCTO to inspect fittings that attach the aft cowl of the nacelle to the main center section. This was done in response to an aft cowl departure in flight and subsequent preliminary crack findings. The TCTO revealed an extensive cracking issue with this interface and an analysis team was tasked to determine the root cause and subsequent inspection requirements for cracking.
The presentation shows how organic Air Force capabilities were leveraged to perform failure analysis, Finite Element Modeling (FEM), and multi-point crack growth analysis to validate results and determine a way forward for fleet management. The materials lab at Hill AFB was able to perform striation counting at multiple points along the fracture surface to correlate crack growth rates to analysis. Siemens Simcenter was used to build a Nastran FEM of the area near the attach fittings. The legacy stress analysis was used to determine appropriate loads. The forces on the attach fitting calculated with the Nastran model were then transferred over to the ESRD StressCheck to model the cracking geometry found in the failure analysis and correlate stress intensities to what would have been required to achieve the measured crack growth rates. The loads were scaled to create the appropriate stress profiles to match failure analysis. Then a multi-point fracture mechanics model was created to grow multiple cracks within the fittings as was seen in the data. The resulting crack growth curves and the detectable flaw sizes from inspection were used to reduce risk and manage the fleet.
|
2:00-2:30 |
Overview of the Implementation of API 579 Stress Intensity Factor Solution for Cylinders in AFGROW
Alexander Litvinov - LexTech, Inc.
|
3:00-3:30 |
MSD Implementation in AFGROW
James Harter, Alex Litvinov - LexTech, Inc.
|
3:30-4:15 |
Various Cracking Patterns, Scenarios and Stages for Crack Growth Analysis
Dr. Patrick Safarian P.E. - FAA
In 1978, The Code of Federal Registry, Title 14 § 25.571 - Damage-tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure, was published and mandated damage tolerance based inspections to ensure that the principal structural elements (PSE) of the airplanes remain safe throughout the operational life of the airplane. The threat associated with this risk mitigation was associated with the fatigue stresses that the structures experience during the operation. To satisfy the requirements of § 25.571, damage tolerance evaluations are carried out for every PSE and maintenance actions are developed and included in the airworthiness limitation section. For the damage tolerance evaluation, fracture mechanics is the common means to set the maintenance program. As part of fracture mechanics, crack growth analysis is performed to determine how many flight cycles or flight hours it takes for a crack to grow from a certain length to the critical length. The assumption of the location and modes of the lead crack and the associated adjacent cracks in the detail design points of the PSE are the key to a meaningful damage tolerance evaluation and suitability of the maintenance program to detect the crack before it reaches the critical length. In this presentation, acceptable cracking scenarios and patterns that are based on test and service history are presented to help the analyst establish suitable inspections to detect a crack in a timely manner and to meet the safety requirements prescribed by the aforementioned regulations.
referenced paper: Damage Tolerance Facts and Fiction, Ulf G. Goranson, Boeing, 14th Plantema Memorial Lecture
Presented at the 17th Symposium of the International Committee on Aeronautical Fatigue Stockholm, Sweden, June 9,1993
|